he
ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes consist of telomeres that contain telomeric
DNA repeats, (TTAGGG)n hexanucleotide repeats
in mammalian chromosomes, and a number of associated proteins. This telomeric
structure is critical for distinguishing the chromosomal terminus from free
ends of damaged DNA, and thus, telomeres prevent the triggering of inappropriate
cell cycle arrest and/or apoptotic responses normally elicited by DNA damage.
In eukaryotic cells, the mechanism of chromosomal replication during cell division
results in incomplete terminal synthesis, so that in the absence of a compensatory
mechanism, 50200 bases of terminal telomeric DNA are lost with each division.
Thus, successive cycles of cell proliferation can lead to progressive telomere
shortening, until a critically short length is reached at which telomere function
is compromised, with consequences that can include replicative senescence, apoptosis,
and tumorigenic chromosomal instability. A compensatory mechanism capable of
adding terminal telomeric repeats is mediated by the RNA-dependent DNA polymerase,
telomerase. This enzyme consists of two essential molecular components, the
telomerase RNA (TR) component, which includes a template for telomeric
DNA, and the catalytic telomerase reverse transcriptase
(TERT), which mediates telomere synthesis. Importantly, recent discoveries have
demonstrated that maintenance of telomere function is also dependent on the
influence of additional telomere-associated proteins, and elucidating the function
of these proteins is, therefore, an area of considerable interest.
TIN2 (TRF1-interacting protein 2) was recently identified as a telomere-associated
protein that interacts with TRF1, a molecule that binds directly to telomeric
DNA and functions as a negative regulator of telomere length. TIN2 contains
N-terminal basic and acidic regions, a central TRF1-binding domain, and a C-terminal
region. The basic and acidic regions are required for the regulation of TRF1
activity by TIN2. The TRF1-binding domain associates with the TRF1-homodimerization
domain, providing for the recruitment of TIN2 to the telomere. In vitro
studies have shown that overexpression of TIN2 inhibits telomere elongation
in human cell lines, whereas expression of dominant-negative mutants of TIN2
enhances telomere elongation. It has been suggested that the binding of wild-type
TIN2 induces changes in TRF1 conformation that in turn favor a telomeric structure
that is inaccessible to telomerase, thus preventing telomerase-mediated telomere
elongation. The absence of TIN2 would conversely favor telomerase accessibility
and telomere elongation.
The physiological role of TIN2 during in vivo development and in normal
cell function had not previously been assessed. To better understand the in
vivo function of TIN2, we have, therefore, studied the effect of TIN2 mutation
on mouse development, using gene-targeting technology.
No homozygous TIN2/ mice were identified
in the offspring of TIN2+/ mouse intercrosses.
Furthermore, homozygous TIN2-deficient embryos were absent as early as day 7.5.
This finding indicated that TIN2 is essential for mouse development and that
homozygous inactivation of TIN2 is lethal before day 7.5 of embryonic development.
However, day 3.5 TIN2/ embryos were
obtained in expected frequency (1/4) among offspring of TIN2+/
intercrosses. When day 3.5 TIN2/
embryonic cells were cultured, it was striking that they were uniformly defective
in their differentiation, in comparison to day 3.5 wild-type embryonic cultures.
Wild-type embryonic cultures grew to form multilayered cell masses, whereas
TIN2/embryonic cultures were flat
and contained few viable cells. A growth and/or survival defect was thus apparent
in TIN2/ cells at an early stage
of embryonic development.
The previously identified function of TIN2 was proposed to involve enhancing
the activity of TRF1 in downregulating the telomerase elongation of telomeres.
We asked whether the embryonic lethality observed in TIN2/ mice might be telomerase
dependent. To explore this possibility, TIN2+/ mice were bred to mTERT/ mice
that lacked telomerase activity. It was striking that no TIN2/ mTERT/ offspring
were observed, whereas TIN2+/+ mTERT/ and TIN2+/ mTERT/ mice survived.
Thus, embryonic lethality of TIN2/ mTERT/ mice indicated that the requirement
for TIN2 in mouse development reflects a previously unappreciated telomerase-independent
function of this molecule.
Recently, it was reported that inactivation of the mouse TRF1 gene results
in embryonic lethality, and that TRF1 knockout blastocysts have a cell
growth defect and increased apoptosis. The phenotype of TIN2 knockout
mice thus appears to be similar to that of TRF1-deficient mice. These observations
imply that, in addition to the telomerase-dependent functions played by TIN2/TRF1
complexes, both TIN2 and TRF1 also function in telomerase-independent roles.
To understand the telomerase-independent roles of TIN2 and TRF1 in embryonic
development and in adult animals, studies of inducible TIN2 or TRF1
conditional knockout mice will be informative. We have in fact generated TIN2
conditional knockout constructs using cre/loxP techniques and will use these
constructs in studies of inducible and tissue-specific TIN2 inactivation.
Additional telomere-associated proteins may be involved in the potentially complex
functions of TIN2 and TRF1, and we are currently pursuing genetic approaches
to analyze candidate components involved in these functions.